Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2014
On Tue Oct 14 05:47:48 2014, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote: > Since I haven't much played with it yet, I don't have much to say, > except this: > I think "lvalue reference" might need to be renamed. My understanding > is that > it's always about the backslash on the left hand side, rather than > having a > reference in an lvalue. ‘Assigning to references’ is the least ambiguous way to refer to it that I can think. How do we abbreviate that into a feature name? If we call it refassign, it’s ambiguous again, because reference assignment would be assignment of references. > Also, we have LVALUE refs. Is this feature > actually > related to that? No. -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=122947Thread Previous | Thread Next