develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from October 2014

Re: Single-item padrange?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Father Chrysostomos
Date:
October 13, 2014 19:33
Subject:
Re: Single-item padrange?
Message ID:
20141013193323.16888.qmail@lists-nntp.develooper.com
Dave Mitchell wrote:
> IIRC, I was thinking that it saves the overhead of a call to pp_pushmark;
> but whether that compensates for the extra overhead in pp_padrange and
> leave_scope(), I don't know (but suspect not). It probably needs
> cachegrinding to find out.

i see.  I had forgotten that padrange takes the place of pushmark.
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About