develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from October 2014

Re: Single-item padrange?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Father Chrysostomos
October 13, 2014 19:33
Re: Single-item padrange?
Message ID:
Dave Mitchell wrote:
> IIRC, I was thinking that it saves the overhead of a call to pp_pushmark;
> but whether that compensates for the extra overhead in pp_padrange and
> leave_scope(), I don't know (but suspect not). It probably needs
> cachegrinding to find out.

i see.  I had forgotten that padrange takes the place of pushmark.

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About