* Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgs@consttype.org> [2014-10-03T08:07:07] > Ah, of course. I now have made the tests a bit more tolerant > with df968918245d10232f955ab0965da7f8d6297a29. Your fix seems A-OK, but in case you did want to verify the message more, I found it useful in the past (91514b78, e.g.) to get the errstr explicitly, then test for that. -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next