On 30 September 2014 15:05, Father Chrysostomos <sprout@cpan.org> wrote: > Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: >> I have now merged this in blead, with more tests, and docs by Peter Martini >> and myself. I also added tests for the $ARGV variable, that was not tested. > > It looks as though you have changed the behaviour of eof(), though I > have not tried building it yet. Maybe, but I don't see where? By the way, I just pushed a test involving eof and <<>> as ad77c200c8a4ed. eof() (with empty parentheses) still continues to open the next file the old way. > Would it not be better to flag in GvEGVx(PL_argvgv) to remember which > of <>/<<>> was last used? There is plenty of room in GvFLAGS. What would that solve? The point is that <> and <<>> differ on how they open the next upcoming file. This is not a property of ARGV.Thread Previous | Thread Next