Re: [perl #121392] use VERSION MODULE should not be considered legal

* bulk88 via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2014-09-24T21:42:18]
> On Tue Sep 23 18:36:36 2014, jkeenan wrote:
> > 
> > This ticket has not generated any discussion since it was file 6+
> > months ago.  Comments?
> 
> I'd keep it since it is DWIM.

I'd see it removed for the opposite reason:  I don't think anyone who writes
"use 2.0 Moose" means anything other than "I am confused or trying to confuse."

-- 
rjbs

• [perl #121392] use VERSION MODULE should not be considered legal by bulk88 via RT
• Re: [perl #121392] use VERSION MODULE should not be considered legal by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [perl #121392] use VERSION MODULE should not be consideredlegal by Abigail
• Re: [perl #121392] use VERSION MODULE should not be considered legal by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: [perl #121392] use VERSION MODULE should not be considered legal by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [perl #121392] use VERSION MODULE should not be considered legal by James E Keenan
• Re: [perl #121392] use VERSION MODULE should not be considered legal by Andreas Koenig
• [perl #121392] use VERSION MODULE should not be considered legal by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• [perl #121392] use VERSION MODULE should not be considered legal by James E Keenan via RT