Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from September 2014
* Sawyer X <xsawyerx@gmail.com> [2014-09-07 20:10]: > I can't find any plan that says "out of the things you can do, these > will be the most useful because they will allow us to pursue this > direction." Aha. I see what you’re after now, I agree this would be valuable, and I do also believe it will work within the constraints of the way p5p works (or doesn’t). I don’t care what we call this, whether we call it a roadmap or not, but that’s not what the term “roadmap” made me think of, and presumably not others either, hence the long debate. You also *said* what you wanted was a prioritised TODO list, and you spoke about having a direction. But what you’re actually asking for is not a priority nor an order for things to happen, it’s their impact. I.e. someplace a novice can look not just to find an answer to “what can I work on?” (what the TODO list answers) but “what can I work on that will make a difference?”. This is much more workable within the structure of p5p than ordering or prioritising of tasks, or long-term visions or the like. “What should be done” is always a dicey question here, but “what would/could happen if someone did this” is an issue of fact and not open to controversy in the same way. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>Thread Previous | Thread Next