On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:48:00 +0200, "H.Merijn Brand" <h.m.brand@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:08:54 +0200, sawyer x <xsawyerx@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It could be good to more consciously curate the one we have, though. > > > Say for example, interviewing people who commit code to ask what their > > > personal unpublished TODO lists contain, and compiling and editing the > > > result; see if there are things in there that could be delegated. > > > > That sounds like a very good idea. Is this something others would find > > comfortable? In the absence of a developer group agreeing on formalizing > > this, it would useless, no? > > I'm comfortable with almost any plan that makes the result have more > happy perl5 users. > > I still have ideas and plans, but I do not have tuits for those at the > moment, as other tasks have a (much) higher priority FWIW my list MUST do ------- • Keep Configure and friends, as patched by the porters in sync with meta/dist. This is backporting. Tedious and boring. Will just need to keep track of what is going on. WANT do ------- • Up meta to 4.x (few month of work with - hopefully - a lot of communication with the author of meta/dist). Low prio. Should do to not make this a massive assignment. • Unpack on streams: while (my ($id, $data) = unpack "Cv/a", $fh) { Will read and forward from handle $fh. The only current workaround is to make it two phased using read or sysread while (read $fh, my $dta, 3) { my ($id, $len) = unpack "Cv", $dta; read $fh, $dta, $len; -- H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/ using perl5.00307 .. 5.19 porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/ http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/Thread Previous | Thread Next