Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from September 2014
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:07 AM, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: > There is the real danger of this turning into a chicken-and-egg debate. Do > we not have a driver because we dont want to have a roadmap, or do we not > have a roadmap because we don't have a driver? > > I am pretty certain if you got a group of proven core contributors > together, that they would coalesce around a common set of objectives that > could form a vision for the future. I would guess that "faster" would be on > the menu, and I bet "real OO primitives" would be there too, maybe "Better > IO model" as well. > I'd add structured exceptions and better Win32 support to that list. And extending custom keywords in the general direction of macros would also be awesome. And maybe proper coroutine primitives. LeonThread Previous | Thread Next