On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:08:54 +0200, sawyer x <xsawyerx@gmail.com> wrote: > > It could be good to more consciously curate the one we have, though. > > Say for example, interviewing people who commit code to ask what their > > personal unpublished TODO lists contain, and compiling and editing the > > result; see if there are things in there that could be delegated. > > That sounds like a very good idea. Is this something others would find > comfortable? In the absence of a developer group agreeing on formalizing > this, it would useless, no? I'm comfortable with almost any plan that makes the result have more happy perl5 users. I still have ideas and plans, but I do not have tuits for those at the moment, as other tasks have a (much) higher priority -- H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/ using perl5.00307 .. 5.19 porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/ http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/Thread Previous | Thread Next