Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2014
* James E Keenan <jkeen@verizon.net> [2014-07-29T18:57:31] > Notwithstanding Samuel's offer to take over maintenance of Time-Piece, I > would like to ask: Is there a compelling reason why this is distributed > with core? > [...] > So Time::Piece (and, for that matter, Time::Seconds) is used in > Porting/acknowledgements.pl. And it's mentioned in perlfaq4. But if this > distribution were not already in 'cpan/', would we be considering it for > distribution with Perl 5 core? No, I wouldn't add it today, if it wasn't already there. It's in core now because it was in core last week, basically. My gut says that removing it will be more annoyance than it's worth. It's not a carefully weighed hunch. -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next