Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2014
On 07/28/2014 10:21 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote: > I've done a few releases of Time::Piece, generally to get required-by-blead > changes out into CPAN versions. > > There is a small, mounting set of pull requests &c. > > https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Time-Piece > https://github.com/rjbs/Time-Piece/pulls > > I am not keeping up with this as well as I should. I would like if someone > would take co-maint, work through these issues, make dev releases, get smoke > results, and make stable releases we can integrate. You probably know the > deal. > > You don't need to be a deep expert in anything, just willing to do the work. > Please let me know. > Rik, Notwithstanding Samuel's offer to take over maintenance of Time-Piece, I would like to ask: Is there a compelling reason why this is distributed with core? ##### ack 'use Time::Piece' . |less ##### Porting/acknowledgements.pl:25:use Time::Piece; cpan/perlfaq/lib/perlfaq4.pod:438: use Time::Piece; cpan/perlfaq/lib/perlfaq4.pod:478: use Time::Piece; cpan/perlfaq/lib/perlfaq4.pod:577: use Time::Piece; cpan/Time-Piece/Seconds.pm:189: use Time::Piece; cpan/Time-Piece/t/03compare.t:3:use Time::Piece; cpan/Time-Piece/t/05overload.t:4:use Time::Piece; cpan/Time-Piece/t/04mjd.t:4:use Time::Piece; cpan/Time-Piece/Piece.pm:634: use Time::Piece; cpan/Time-Piece/Piece.pm:832: use Time::Piece ':override'; ##### So Time::Piece (and, for that matter, Time::Seconds) is used in Porting/acknowledgements.pl. And it's mentioned in perlfaq4. But if this distribution were not already in 'cpan/', would we be considering it for distribution with Perl 5 core? Thank you very much. Jim KeenanThread Previous | Thread Next