Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2014
* Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com> [2014-07-27T05:03:56] > Rafael Garcia-Suarez writes: > > Why the double negation? > > This way, the only double negative is in Rik's description of the plan. > From a Perl programmer's point of view, it's simply that somebody > wanting to use the feature use-s it. > > > use feature 'nomagic_open_argv' should work similarly. > > But that imposes the double negative on users. In that if in perl 5.22 > nomagic_open_argv is the default, somebody wanting the magic behaviour > would have to do: > > no feature qw<nomagic_open_argv>; > [...] Smylers has communicated my thoughts for me. :) -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next