On 24 July 2014 19:13, Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > * Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgs@consttype.org> [2014-07-24T11:51:40] > > I believe that this was discussed here some years ago, and that this > > was suggested by TomC. Anyway, I pushed a patch on rgs/nomagicopen. > > The patch is incomplete as it lacks docs and tests. I welcome feedback > > on the intent of the feature. > > Gut reaction after 30s while sitting in a conference session: > > I like the feature, but I think it might be too small a change to pick up > a new > operator. What about a pragma/feature? > > Unless you have a use for the <<>> operator I dont see your point at all. And I am saddened the first reply to Rafaels proposal was a bike-shed comment, and from the pumpking too. We should just vote up or vote down proposals. No more bike-shedding. Either you have a patch that is an alternative that we can consider or you should vote no and we should let the majority win. Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next