On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgs@consttype.org> wrote: > On 24 July 2014 22:20, Eric Brine <ikegami@adaelis.com> wrote: > > The goal is to change the behaviour of reading from ARGV, not <>. > > Same thing. <> is exactly equivalent to <ARGV>. Actually the lexer > transforms <> into <ARGV> even before it gets to the parser. > > > Unless <<>> is short for <NOTARGV>, this seems like a broken design. > What > > happens if someone uses readline(), read() or sysread() on ARGV? > > Easy, readline is the same as <>, read and sysread bypass magic > entirely. Nothing new here. > Then I retract my comment.Thread Previous | Thread Next