Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2014
On 10 May 2014 11:13, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 May 2014 01:23, Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > >> * demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> [2014-05-06T11:06:55] >> > These are the ones I would like to see cherry-picked: >> > >> > [ a bunch of Hash::Util stuff ] >> >> In general, this doesn't seem like it fits the guidelines for "stuff we >> apply >> while trying to get the release out the door." Typo fixes in docs are >> fair. >> Changes to code that do not fix blockers are not. >> > > The hash util changes are to diagnostics code useful and intended only for > analysing our hash function. > > Anyway, I dont care much, I just think this policy should be more flexible > than you make it out. > > Changes to something useful, sure, but changes to a script that calculates > the average length of a bucket chain? Doesn't make sense to me. > Especially when we have a three month "no changes" block going on. :-( Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous