Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings

* Karl Williamson <public@khwilliamson.com> [2014-05-05T11:35:44]
> But, since you mention it, one simply ignores any partial character at the
> end.  If all the complete characters that fit in the (typically) 512 buffer
> are UTF-8, we don't look at one that starts in the final few bytes that
> crosses the 512-byte boundary.

That's what I assumed the answer would be.  I just wanted to get it on the
record.  Thanks!

-- 
rjbs

• RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by Karl Williamson
• Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by David Cantrell
• Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by Brad Gilbert
• Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by bulk88
• Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by Karl Williamson
• Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by Karl Williamson
• Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
• Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by Ed Avis
• Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by Ricardo Signes
• Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by Karl Williamson
• Re: RFC: Making -B and -T work better on 8-bit encodings by Ricardo Signes