On Fri May 02 06:28:45 2014, ikegami@adaelis.com wrote: > On Sun Dec 22 04:08:19 2013, zefram@fysh.org wrote: > > Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote: > > > Should I > > > * make all ops store line numbers, fixing numerous bugs and > > > increasing memory usage, > > > * introduce a new SUBOP op type that includes a line number or > > > * make PL_copline localisation only protect the inner value, not > > > the outer? > > > > None of the above. The current behaviour is not a bug > > What do you mean by "current behaviour"? Currently, blead is issuing > error messages with no line numbers, and I'd consider that a bug. Or maybe that wasn't mentioned? The commit also removes " at -e line 1" from the following: $ ./perl -e'qw' Can't find string terminator ";" anywhere before EOF. --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: resolved https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=119593Thread Previous | Thread Next