Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2014
On 04/27/2014 02:11 PM, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > On Sunday-201404-27, 15:57, Craig A. Berry wrote: >> It's complaining about the return value, which we're doing our best to >> throw away and thereby emulate a void gconvert: > > I am confused: what's wrong with (void)? The makers of gcc refuse to consider casting to (void) to be a valid way of handling the return value of a function which is declared as having its return value not ignored. I would furnish a link, but every time I look at it, my blood boils at the thought that these <expletive sequence deleted> think they are qualified to write compilers. I could go on, as the heat is starting to rise within me, but won'tThread Previous | Thread Next