Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2014
Re: bleadfreeze!
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
H.Merijn Brand
Date:
March 24, 2014 06:50
Subject:
Re: bleadfreeze!
Message ID:
20140324075019.16d8c5a2@pc09.procura.nl
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:31:27 -0400, Ricardo Signes
<perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote:
> I'd hoped to send this email much earlier, along with a new review of blockers,
> but my weekend has been sort of unrelenting.
>
> As foretold by Porting/release_schedule.pod, blead is now frozen for 5.20.0,
> expected in about two months. The freeze means that the only things getting
> committed should be:
>
> * fixes for blockers
> * fixes for problems that would become blockers if not immediately fixed
> * uncontroversial documentation improvements
Will two OK's on IRC from other committers be enough, or will every
patch to the main branch need a ML post?
I just read Nicholas' quest for the use of ccflags in Configure when
checking for libraries. Does that qualify for fast(er) action?
--
H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/
using perl5.00307 .. 5.19 porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/
http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next