Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2014
On Tue Jan 22 10:31:03 2013, hanekomu wrote: > Hi nicomen, > > I've already started to work on this. There aren't that many files to > change, as far as I can see. > > To get all files that don't require test.pl but do print something and > are not in the directories-to- > be-excluded as mentioned above: > > $ ack -G '\.t$' -L 'require.*test.pl' | xargs ack -l print | ack -v > '^(base|cmd|comp|opbasic|re)/' > > op/sprintf.t > porting/maintainers.t > porting/podcheck.t > run/switchF1.t > run/switchp.t > win32/system.t > The 6 files above all appear to have been "handled", i.e., they were either converted to using t/test.pl or a comment was added stating why they were specifically not converted to t/test.pl. Hence, I don't see anything more to be done on this ticket. If you disagree with that judgment, please speak up. Otherwise, I will close the ticket within 7 days. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan > I've already worked on op/sprintf.t and porting/maintainers.t (and > changed > Porting/Maintainers.pm to output results in a deterministic order). > > Also, I'm going to - as discussed with rjbs on IRC - make the > "chdir/@INC/require test.pl" code > at the top of each test more consistent across all tests. > > So if you don't mind I'd like to continue working on this bug. --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=116483Thread Previous | Thread Next