On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Konovalov, Vadim <Vadim.Konovalov@emc.com>wrote: > Indeed. > > from technical POV - this support UTF-EBCDIC - while it obviously costs > some > maintenance efforts - does it cost any CPU speed for non-EBCDICs? IMO it requires significant maintenance efforts. For example, we have been working on a new UTF-8 IO layer. Adding UTF-EBCDIC support to that is enough work that I'd qualify it as a rewrite (validation and translation are fundamentally different problems). Not that the current :utf8 DWIMs on UTF-EBCDIC… I don't think it costs now if we don't touch any unicode related code, but we probably will. LeonThread Previous | Thread Next