> From: Karl Williamson [mailto:public@khwilliamson.com] > But as it turns out, I agree with him. Unless we can get a regular smoke > facility, there's no point in trying to support EBCDIC. Indeed. from technical POV - this support UTF-EBCDIC - while it obviously costs some maintenance efforts - does it cost any CPU speed for non-EBCDICs? Vadim.Thread Previous | Thread Next