Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2014
I wrote, in response to Matthew Horsfall: > (I suspect its use of call_sv is buggy and that the commit that > supposedly broke it is a red herring.) It is likely that, since require() does not use the existing stack, the stack at the offending call to Data::Clone::clone() is smaller than it used to be, requiring a clone callback to reallocated the stack. Indeed, Data::Clone does not protect against stack reallocation during callbacks. RDF::Trine does not depend on Data::Clone, so I do not know which of its dependencies has a similar bug. If I do not get a chance, could you try running whichever of its tests is failing through valgrind (presuming it fails for you)?Thread Previous | Thread Next