Tony Cook wrote: > On Mon Jan 27 16:02:45 2014, perl5-porters@perl.org wrote: > > What is wrong with that? It shows how perl understands the code. > > Evaluating it produces an op tree that behaves identically. > > The padrange optimization which this is built on, does preserve the deparse: > > $ ~/perl/blead/bin/perl5.19.8 -MO=Deparse -e 'sub foo { my ($x, $y); my $z; 1 } > ' > sub foo { > my($x, $y); > my $z; > 1; > } > -e syntax OK I would consider that adventitious.Thread Previous | Thread Next