Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> writes: > I think we should not break backward-compatibility, but it may be a > good idea to keep some features frozen and recommend looking at better > "user-land" alternatives on CPAN. Precisely. My idea was to keep current functionality (or a reasonable subset thereof) in the core, and provide external modules that implement (core plus) extended functionality, probably/hopefully in a much better and friendlier way. -- JohanThread Previous | Thread Next