On Wed Oct 30 21:29:27 2013, sprout wrote: > On Mon Oct 28 22:02:51 2013, sprout wrote: > > On Mon Sep 16 23:53:11 2013, sprout wrote: > > > How about having an array shared between threads and indexed by > > > cop_seq? > > > > > > Or, if that makes the array too long, extend the struct for dbstate > > > ops > > > and store a separate sequence number. > > > > > > When the op is freed, it can invalidate its entry. We would need > > > three > > > values: 0 = no op available, 1 = no breakpoint, 2 = breakpoint set. > > > > > > The numeric values stored in @DB::dbline elements would be indices > > > into > > > that breakpoint array. > > > > Please review the attached patch, which is also on the sprout/dbline > > branch. > > In particular, does B::C need to access the extra fields that dbstate > ops now have, or can we keep the cop–dbop distinction private? Having received no response, I applied this yesterday, as c1cec775e. -- Father ChrysostomosThread Next