Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2013
On Sat Dec 21 18:07:08 2013, sprout wrote: > > Could someone else familiar with ops review my suggestions? > > Should I > • make all ops store line numbers, fixing numerous bugs and > increasing memory usage, > • introduce a new SUBOP op type that includes a line number or > • make PL_copline localisation only protect the inner value, not > the outer? > I suggest won't fix. IMO line numbers are on a statement, not expression/substatement basis. None of the suggestions sound like the increase in memory or CPU will justify a bug about undocumented and subject to change behavior. -- bulk88 ~ bulk88 at hotmail.com --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=119593Thread Previous