develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from December 2013

Re: [perl #120808] perlsource.pod: Misleading discussion of whatshould go into ext/

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
James E Keenan
Date:
December 20, 2013 20:54
Subject:
Re: [perl #120808] perlsource.pod: Misleading discussion of whatshould go into ext/
Message ID:
20131220205451.1720.qmail@lists-nntp.develooper.com
On 12/19/13 9:34 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> * Tony Cook via RT<perlbug-followup@perl.org>  [2013-12-17T17:57:53]
>> On Mon Dec 16 22:53:48 2013, bulk88 wrote:
>>> Pod-Html should be on CPAN or dual lifed. Pod-Html, which is used by
>>> ActivePerl for their pretty (CSSed) HTML docs, suffered some bug fixes
>>> and some regressions between 5.14 and 5.16. I'm not sure where to even
>>> file a ticket, or if it can ever be fixed since Pod-Html is not
>>> distributed on CPAN and therefore isn't upgradable.
>>
>> I don't think anyone would object to you packaging Pod-Html for CPAN.
>
> I would owe the packager a beer, juice, or other beverage or snack.
>

The discussion has gone a bit off topic.  I'd like to discuss Pod-Html, 
but in a separate thread.   So, too get back on topic, let me ask:

rjbs:  Do you have feedback on my OP on pod/perlsource.pod and on Father 
C's and Tony's comments?

Thank you very much.
Jim Keenan

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About