Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2013
On 12/19/13 9:34 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote: > * Tony Cook via RT<perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2013-12-17T17:57:53] >> On Mon Dec 16 22:53:48 2013, bulk88 wrote: >>> Pod-Html should be on CPAN or dual lifed. Pod-Html, which is used by >>> ActivePerl for their pretty (CSSed) HTML docs, suffered some bug fixes >>> and some regressions between 5.14 and 5.16. I'm not sure where to even >>> file a ticket, or if it can ever be fixed since Pod-Html is not >>> distributed on CPAN and therefore isn't upgradable. >> >> I don't think anyone would object to you packaging Pod-Html for CPAN. > > I would owe the packager a beer, juice, or other beverage or snack. > The discussion has gone a bit off topic. I'd like to discuss Pod-Html, but in a separate thread. So, too get back on topic, let me ask: rjbs: Do you have feedback on my OP on pod/perlsource.pod and on Father C's and Tony's comments? Thank you very much. Jim KeenanThread Previous | Thread Next