Re: [perl #120808] perlsource.pod: Misleading discussion of whatshould go into ext/

* Tony Cook via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2013-12-17T17:57:53]
> On Mon Dec 16 22:53:48 2013, bulk88 wrote:
> > Pod-Html should be on CPAN or dual lifed. Pod-Html, which is used by
> > ActivePerl for their pretty (CSSed) HTML docs, suffered some bug fixes
> > and some regressions between 5.14 and 5.16. I'm not sure where to even
> > file a ticket, or if it can ever be fixed since Pod-Html is not
> > distributed on CPAN and therefore isn't upgradable.
> 
> I don't think anyone would object to you packaging Pod-Html for CPAN.

I would owe the packager a beer, juice, or other beverage or snack.

-- 
rjbs

• [perl #120808] perlsource.pod: Misleading discussion of what should go into ext/ by Tony Cook via RT
• Re: [perl #120808] perlsource.pod: Misleading discussion of whatshould go into ext/ by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [perl #120808] perlsource.pod: Misleading discussion of whatshould go into ext/ by James E Keenan
• [perl #120808] perlsource.pod: Misleading discussion of what should go into ext/ by bulk88 via RT
• [perl #120808] perlsource.pod: Misleading discussion of what should go into ext/ by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• [perl #120808] perlsource.pod: Misleading discussion of what should go into ext/ by James E Keenan