On Mon Dec 16 19:52:51 2013, rrt wrote: > On Mon Dec 16 15:38:07 2013, tonyc wrote: > > For Unix systems (everything but OS/2, Win32, VMS) syscopy is an > > alias > > for copy: > > ... > > I don't think your edit of the sentence from: > > > > For Unix systems, this is equivalent to the simple C<copy> routine, > > which doesn't preserve OS-specific attributes. > > > > to: > > > > For Unix systems, this is equivalent to the simple C<copy> routine, > > and > > doesn't preserve attributes. > > > > adds much, since copy() does preserve OS independent attributes - the > > content of the file. > > I fear I was unclear. I proposed that change in the case that the > semantics were the other way around, i.e. if syscopy on Unix worked > the same as the description of the simple copy routine. Since, as you > say, it is not so, it is my first suggestion that should be taken into > account, namely, that the above sentence be rewritten as: > > For Unix systems, this is equivalent to the simple "cp" routine. I said that syscopy is an alias for copy, neither is equivalent to cp on Unix systems. Tony --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=120619Thread Next