Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2013
On Mon Dec 16 19:24:18 2013, jkeen@verizon.net wrote: > Now, I could certainly live with a description of 'ext/' as holding > libraries with a CPAN-style directory and file layout not maintained or > distributed on CPAN. That wouldn't be a very elegant description, and > it would sever the tie between 'ext' and 'eXternal Subroutine'. But it > would be more accurate than what we have now. And this wouldn't require > us to move any libraries from one of the subdirs to another. I believe this is the correct way to handle it. On Mon Dec 16 22:53:48 2013, bulk88 wrote: > Pod-Html should be on CPAN or dual lifed. Pod-Html, which is used by > ActivePerl for their pretty (CSSed) HTML docs, suffered some bug fixes > and some regressions between 5.14 and 5.16. I'm not sure where to even > file a ticket, or if it can ever be fixed since Pod-Html is not > distributed on CPAN and therefore isn't upgradable. I don't think anyone would object to you packaging Pod-Html for CPAN. Tony --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=120808Thread Next