On Sun Jul 07 14:27:12 2013, gottreu wrote: > These are the modules that need to be updated on CPAN. I downloaded > all the distributions listed in > Porting/Maintainers.pl (even the commented out ExtUtils-Constant) and > checked Makefile.PL and Build.PL. > This list of distributions was current as of commit > 0c0d42fffa5c2ddd284610f681b65d355471189b. > [snip] > > These twenty (20) are in dist/ in the core, the rest are in cpan/. > Attribute-Handlers-0.93 > base-2.18 > bignum-0.32 > constant-1.27 > PathTools-3.40 > Data-Dumper-2.145 > ExtUtils-Install-1.54 > Filter-Simple-0.88 > I18N-LangTags-0.35 > if-0.0601 > IO-1.25 > lib-0.63 > Locale-Maketext-1.23 > Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0.30 > Math-BigInt-1.997 > Math-BigRat-0.2602 > Net-Ping-2.41 > SelfLoader-1.20 > Storable-2.39 > Tie-File-0.98 I had occasion to look at this ticket again while looking at https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89664 this evening. Only a subset of these distributions have their own Makefile.PL. 1. Two of these distros use 5.012 as the cut-off rather than 5.011. Is that acceptable? dist/lib/Makefile.PL dist/Module-CoreList/Makefile.PL 2. I have prepared a patch for dist/Cwd/Makefile.PL. The tests in dist/Cwd/t/ pass, but I get a failure in t/porting/utils.t: ##### # Failed test 38 - Porting/makerel compiles at porting/utils.t line 89 # got "Subroutine File::Spec::Unix::canonpath redefined at lib/Cwd.pm line 249.\nSubroutine File::Spec::Unix::catdir redefined at lib/Cwd.pm line 249.\nSubroutine File::Spec::Unix::catfile redefined at lib/Cwd.pm line 249.\nPorting/makerel syntax OK\n" # expected "Porting/makerel syntax OK\n" not ok 38 - Porting/makerel compiles ##### Can anyone diagnose this? Thank you very much. Jim Keenan --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=116479Thread Previous | Thread Next