develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from October 2013

[perl #120100] Should PUSHSTACKi() set the mark?

From:
Father Chrysostomos via RT
Date:
October 26, 2013 06:40
Subject:
[perl #120100] Should PUSHSTACKi() set the mark?
Message ID:
rt-4.0.18-14232-1382769590-392.120100-15-0@perl.org
On Fri Oct 04 15:36:19 2013, davem wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:16:27AM -0700, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote:
> > Anything popping the caller’s mark is already buggy, so having a bad
> > mark that will crash will make the bug more apparent, no?
> 
> +1

I think that means I can mark this as rejected.

-- 

Father Chrysostomos


---
via perlbug:  queue: perl5 status: open
https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=120100



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About