Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2013
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Steve Hay <steve.m.hay@googlemail.com> wrote: >> I would further request that UPSTREAM => undef be removed, or used to mean >> *exactly* "this module only lives in blead and is not dual-lifed". >> I am currently looking at the code in Module::CoreList to see if it is >> possible to conclusively determine a module's dual-life status from the >> information currently available -- I don't think the current UPSTREAM >> status is useful here. >> > > The current usage is only intended to say that it hasn't been decided > whether UPSTREAM is blead or cpan. I agree that it would be good for > all the undef cases to be resolved one way or the other, and will > start a new thread regarding that soon. It looks like most of the "undef" cases should just be resolved based on whether they are in "cpan/" or something else. (Why are we even tracking documentation files in Maintainers?) David -- David Golden <xdg@xdg.me> Take back your inbox! → http://www.bunchmail.com/ Twitter/IRC: @xdgThread Previous | Thread Next