Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from September 2013
* Father Chrysostomos <sprout@cpan.org> [2013-09-15T19:42:40] > Ricardo Signes wrote: > > I think we should have it govern only interpolation. There would be no > > reason to disable it for the other form. Given that, I'd call the feature > > interpolate_postderef. I think. Got a better suggestion. > > That is rather long. Maybe something with qq in it. Put postderef at the > beginning of the name, and the two features show up together in > alphabetical order: > > postderef > postderef_qq I was just thinking about this question over the weekend, and I was surprised nobody had objected to its length. I'd tried to think of something shorter without being opaque, and I failed. You have succeeded. Thanks! -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next