On Thu Aug 22 19:17:59 2013, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote: > * Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2013-08- > 20T11:51:46] > > Would it be acceptable to break the usual rule and patch > Test::Builder > > directly in blead (assigning it a previously unused dev version)? > > I've just poked Schwern both via GitHub and another channel. Let's > give him a > day or two to state his intentions before patching blead... which we > should do > if needed. (and if you do that, please add a ticket to #116923 which > I will > follow up on) I have applied Niels’ warning patch now as 9da2d0467dc5 (thank you). His precedence patch has been applied as 13c65ef8cd5. I have opened ticket #119825 to track this. -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59802