* Karl Williamson <public@khwilliamson.com> [2013-08-25 07:20]: > Thoughts? What other reasonable choice was there in the first place? Isn’t it kind of self-evident that codepoints that are not part of Unicode do not have Unicode properties? In short, is the warning here warning the programmer of something at all unexpected? It seems to me it isn’t, and so it also seems to me that mentioning in the documentation that this is indeed the chosen semantics should be perfectly sufficient. So assuming I haven’t overlooked any facts, I’ll agree that the warning should go. -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>Thread Previous | Thread Next