On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 03:24:45PM -0600, Karl Williamson wrote: > On 08/21/2013 01:11 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:01:27AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:26:27PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > >>> D'oh! > >>> > >>> It possibly does matter. :-) > >>> It's certainly worth fixing. And I suspect worth backporting, in case it > >>> matters. > >> > >> I've pushed both to smoke-me/nicholas/perl5db-man > >> I don't think that there are going to be any problems, but Tony and I thought > >> that at least twice before... > > > > Hi, > > > > this went into 5.18.1, but it's still not in blead. Is that intentional? > > > > (I can file a perlbug too if you like but it seems a bit late for that.) No, I had assumed that whoever grabbed it for 5.18.1 would also have "dealt" with the smoke-me branch. > I have now pushed it to blead as commit > 0b2badd303822058883646ab6f807ec4c8b39206 I've pushed the second commit to blead (Skip the perldoc test if 'man' is missing) and deleted the branch. Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next