Ricardo Signes wrote: > We allow ->@* at the end of an expression that we would've allowed up to that > point. Of your examples above, which I've taken the liberty of numbering, #1 > and #2 qualify. Of the rest, none do. ... > So: "@{ $foo->[0] }" isn't so bad; generic interpolation form Your response comes across as a bit ambiguous. So will ->@* and ->@[ and ->@{ interpolate? If so, what will the feature feature be called? (Yes, we need a fea- ture feature for that.) If we have a feature feature, then should it govern the new syntax altogether, or just its interpolation?Thread Previous | Thread Next