On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Father Chrysostomos <sprout@cpan.org> wrote: > I wrote: >> And ->$& of course, both with \ and as a sub call. > > Grrr. I meant ->&* . > what's the advantage of $coderef->&* over $coderef->() ??? I thought coderefs already had a postfix syntax. Is it supposed to be another way to spell C<goto &$coderef> ? Also, how about postfix reference operator? my $scalar; my $reference = $scalar -> \*; # instead of \$scalar -- You've got to wiggle before you can crawlThread Previous | Thread Next