Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2013
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Father Chrysostomos <sprout@cpan.org> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> And ->$& of course, both with \ and as a sub call.
>
> Grrr. I meant ->&* .
>
what's the advantage of $coderef->&* over $coderef->() ??? I thought
coderefs already had a postfix syntax. Is it supposed to be another
way to spell C<goto &$coderef> ?
Also, how about postfix reference operator?
my $scalar;
my $reference = $scalar -> \*; # instead of \$scalar
--
You've got to wiggle before you can crawl
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next