Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2013
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 08:22:06PM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Damian Conway <damian@conway.org> [2013-08-11 01:20]:
> > And, ideally, the source code fragment being passed into the
> > overloading sub would not just be the "contents" of each constant
> > construct, but the entire syntax of the construct, including:
> >
> > - the delimiters used
> >
> > - any keyword used ('q', 'qq', 'qr', 'qx', 's', 'tr', or 'y')
> >
> > - any flags used (i.e. in the case of 's', 'tr', and 'y')
> >
> >
> > That is, reworking and extending your own example […] would output:
> >
> > source(qr/abc(?{})def$x/i)
> > source("ABC$a[$b+$c]DEF")
> > source(s{foo}{bar}gxms)
> > source(0xDeadCode)
>
> Wouldn’t it be better if these paraphernalia were passed in as separate
> arguments so that the Perl code won’t have to implement its own parsing
> on top of perl’s?
Sorry, I don't understand the question.
--
Red sky at night - gerroff my land!
Red sky at morning - gerroff my land!
-- old farmers' sayings #14
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next