* Eric Brine <ikegami@adaelis.com> [2013-08-06T15:33:54] > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Karl Williamson <public@khwilliamson.com>wrote: > Are we going to add just one of the s///-specific and m//-specific flags? > Could they be in a separate section or could we at least acknowledge > they're not pattern match modifiers? I dislike for them to be listed as > pattern match modifiers when they aren't and when they can't be provided to > (?MODS) and (?MODS-MODS:...). A cross-reference would be useful. The patch we have is better than nothing. Better than that might be something like: There are a number of flags that can be found at the end of regular expression constructs that are I<not> generic regular expression flags, but apply to the operation being performed, like matching or substitution (C<m//> or C<s///> respectively). These flags, fully documented in L<perlop/Whatever>, are: e - (...eval stuff...) r - (...replace stuff...) g - (...globally stuff...) If the current patch is applied as-is, I think that's fine, and I can do the above a bit later. -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next