Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2013
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Karl Williamson <public@khwilliamson.com>wrote: > Nonetheless, I believe it would be better to briefly mention it in perlre > with a pointer to perlop. It's confused more than one person, even though > no one seems confused by the lack of a mention of /e. I think both of them > should be mentioned in perlre. We could just say that these are s/// > flags, or we could briefly indicate what they do; I have no problems with > Tony's wording. > Are we going to add just one of the s///-specific and m//-specific flags? Could they be in a separate section or could we at least acknowledge they're not pattern match modifiers? I dislike for them to be listed as pattern match modifiers when they aren't and when they can't be provided to (?MODS) and (?MODS-MODS:...).Thread Previous | Thread Next