On Tue Jul 09 22:30:15 2013, tonyc wrote: > On Sat Jul 06 12:46:41 2013, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote: > > Yes, I think so. > > I'll produce a better patch for it sometime. > > One problem with my patch above is it complains "Argument 'foo!' isn't > numeric..." but ++ accepts non-numeric arguments, so the message needs > to change. Here's an improved change with tests and a different message. Tony --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=3330Thread Previous | Thread Next