Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2013
On Tue Jul 30 04:22:24 2013, demerphq wrote: > On 30 July 2013 03:34, James E Keenan via RT <perlbug- > followup@perl.org> wrote: > > The attached should be considered a first draft of those regression > > tests. Please improve. > > IMO this is just fine. I might have put them in t/re/re_tests but > where you put them is ok as well. The main difference is the > t/re/re_tests get run in a bunch of variant forms so are probably more > exhaustive that pat_advanced. In general pat_advanced.t and related > files are used to test things that require perl code to test, or which > have caused segfaults in the past. > > Yves Please review the 119075-SECOND patch, attached. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=119075Thread Previous | Thread Next