Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2013
On 30 July 2013 03:34, James E Keenan via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > On Mon Jul 29 17:52:19 2013, jkeenan wrote: >> On Mon Jul 29 11:09:53 2013, nicholas wrote: >> >> > >> > Also, presumably we should add Philip Hazel's test cases as regression >> > tests. >> > >> > Nicholas Clark >> > >> >> Is there a particular file in t/re/ where we should stick these tests? >> >> If someone can advise me on that, then I will insert them. >> >> Thank you very much. >> Jim Keenan > > > The attached should be considered a first draft of those regression > tests. Please improve. IMO this is just fine. I might have put them in t/re/re_tests but where you put them is ok as well. The main difference is the t/re/re_tests get run in a bunch of variant forms so are probably more exhaustive that pat_advanced. In general pat_advanced.t and related files are used to test things that require perl code to test, or which have caused segfaults in the past. Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next