imo yes On 30 July 2013 02:46, James E Keenan via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > On Mon Jul 29 10:22:42 2013, nicholas wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 07:20:13PM +0200, demerphq wrote: >> > On 29 July 2013 18:17, Philip Hazel <perlbug-followup@perl.org> >> wrote: >> >> > > $ perl -e 'x =~ /(?:(a(*SKIP)b)){0}(?:(?1)|ac)/' >> > > Infinite recursion in regex at -e line 1. >> > > >> > > As far as I can see, there is no infinite recursion here. >> Capturing group >> > > number 1 is (a(*SKIP)b) and that does not do any recursing, so >> calling >> > > it via (?1) is just a single recursion. >> > >> > This looks to me like another example of {0} => NOTHING optimization >> > not playing nicely with recursive patterns. >> >> Yes, caused by commit 3018b823898645e44b8c37c70ac5c6302b031381 >> >> Fixed by commit 2e3a23da260a7ec5d61b81cb34c38de5e528b41d >> >> Nicholas Clark >> > > > $ ./perl -Ilib -v | head -3 | tail -2This is perl 5, version 19, > subversion 3 (v5.19.3 (v5.19.2-208-g5c24ac0)) built for darwin-2level > > $ ./perl -Ilib -E 'if (x =~ /(?:(a(*SKIP)b)){0}(?:(?1)|ac)/) {say "yes"} > else { say "no"};' > no > > > Is this ticket closable? > > --- > via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open > https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=119071 -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous