On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 01:55:17PM -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote: > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Ricardo Signes > <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > > * Andy Dougherty <doughera@lafayette.edu> [2013-07-24T12:47:02] > >> Yes, the fix in ticket RT #118055 is suitable for maint and ought to > >> go in. What might be confusing is that the subsequent fix in blead, > >> commit 784e50c8, which used PADOFFSET instead of IV in the relevant > >> structure, is not suitable for maint. > > > > re: #118055, I see this: > > > > https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=118055#txn-1227779 > > > > Does this subthread actually point to any changes yet to be applied to maint? > > My reading of the ticket and the git log is that what can be done for > maint-5.18 has already been done as these two: > > http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/45d94421d77056cb11b2961462ab1ca53d4bdb65 > > http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/ffa0fbf4bf6f9a9fee2673ffd9082cb02623a791 Correct. There is nothing further to be done for maint on this issue. -- Andy Dougherty doughera@lafayette.eduThread Previous | Thread Next