Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2013
On Jul 25, 2013, at 7:34 PM, David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be good for catching all errors in a library.
>
> With that use case in mind, having a package catch scope might be good
> too, which would get checked whenever an exception happens in a named
> sub that lives in that package, after the file lexical scope. We'd
> need a way to specify that we're writing into the package scope and
> not the file scope, how about COLON-COLON, or just fully qualified,
> that way you could write them into other packages
Don’t we have a package scope since 5.14 or so if you use a block?
package Foo {
CATCH {
# BOOM.
}
}
David
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next