Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2013
On Fri May 25 04:21:50 2012, LeonT wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good point. This is the kind of pitfall that should probable be > > explained in perlipc. > > On second reading, that does not seem necessary. The process will > receive a sigchild under these circumstances, but waitpid will ignore > that status unless asked for it (using the WUNTRACED and WCONTINUE > options). I've attached a simplified patch that changes the single waitpid() call to a loop without the WIF*() checks from the original patch. Looking at the text around that example, I wonder if this example could be consolidated with the example above it, which already used a waitpid() loop. Tony --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=113028Thread Next